<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Code-Reading on vnykmshr</title><link>https://blog.vnykmshr.com/writing/tags/code-reading/</link><description>Recent content in Code-Reading on vnykmshr</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.vnykmshr.com/writing/tags/code-reading/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Git log as archaeology</title><link>https://blog.vnykmshr.com/writing/git-log-as-archaeology/</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.vnykmshr.com/writing/git-log-as-archaeology/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The source file you&amp;rsquo;re looking at is a summary. The history is the full document. Most of the time you don&amp;rsquo;t care &amp;ndash; you&amp;rsquo;re working on the current shape of the code and the summary is enough. But sometimes the current shape stops answering.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I reach for git history during RCAs, bug hunts, and questions the code can&amp;rsquo;t answer from its current form. Why is this file organised this way? Who introduced this assumption? When did this fallback stop being a fallback and start being the main path? The commit log knows. The current source doesn&amp;rsquo;t.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The config file</title><link>https://blog.vnykmshr.com/writing/the-config-file/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.vnykmshr.com/writing/the-config-file/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A connection pool size of 10 is a guess. A connection pool size of 37 is a scar. Someone ran out of connections on a Tuesday afternoon, tried 50, watched latency spike, backed off to 40, still too high, landed on 37 after a week of graphs, and committed it with &amp;ldquo;tune pool size.&amp;rdquo; The code says what happens. The config says what happened.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nobody talks about config though. Not the twelve-factor app kind, not the &amp;ldquo;should we use YAML or TOML&amp;rdquo; kind. The actual values. The numbers someone picked and committed without a PR description, three years ago, that are still running in production.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The margins</title><link>https://blog.vnykmshr.com/writing/the-margins/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.vnykmshr.com/writing/the-margins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Someone reconstructed the Claude Code source from npm sourcemaps today. Half a million lines of TypeScript, just sitting there. Not looking for bugs. Just curious what it looks like when you open the hood.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The loading spinner has 190 verbs. Not &amp;ldquo;Loading&amp;rdquo; 190 times &amp;ndash; 190 different words. &amp;ldquo;Flibbertigibbeting.&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;Recombobulating.&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;Lollygagging.&amp;rdquo; You can add your own through settings, append or replace. Someone wrote all of these knowing most users would never notice, and then built a config API so the ones who did could play along.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Reading code</title><link>https://blog.vnykmshr.com/writing/reading-code/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.vnykmshr.com/writing/reading-code/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Scanners find what&amp;rsquo;s syntactically wrong. The interesting issues live in assumptions &amp;ndash; and assumptions don&amp;rsquo;t have signatures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not scanning, not fuzzing. Just reading code the way you&amp;rsquo;d read it if you were about to own it in production. Entry points, data flows, where input meets trust.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Missing headers, outdated dependencies &amp;ndash; that&amp;rsquo;s the baseline, scanners handle it fine. The interesting issues live a layer deeper. A path that&amp;rsquo;s protected in one subsystem but wide open in another. A parse-time operation that nobody thought to bound. Code that was correct when it was written but the system grew around it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>